Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Red and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z, getting a general score of 81.5 against 74.5. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo OS. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a way newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z, but it is much thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Motorola Moto Z has just a bit better looking display than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a larger display and a lot more pixels per inch of screen. Moto Z features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with a better performing CPU than Moto Z, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a higher number of faster cores. The iPhone SE (2020) has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z, although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a lower 12 megapixels resolution camera, they both have the same aperture.
Moto Z has a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 43% more battery size.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) costs a lot more than the Moto Z, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.