Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black glare |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 3 has a general score of 86.3, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 general score. Asus ROG Phone 3's body is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z's, but it is extremely thicker and a lot heavier. Asus ROG Phone 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a bit sharper screen than Moto Z, because although it has a way worse screen pixel density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a larger display. Moto Z has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. The Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 131% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.