Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black glare |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition is much better than Motorola Moto Z, having an 87.4 score against 74.5. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition's design is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z's, but it's noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a bit better looking display than Moto Z, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a lot lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with just a bit more memory to install games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a way better battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 131 percent larger battery size.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has a lot better video resolution and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.