Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a global score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 global score. Although it's the best in this review, Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom is a noticeably heavier and notably thicker phone than Motorola Moto Z. The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a little faster processor than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also has more processing cores (although slower).
Moto Z features a bit better looking display than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Moto Z also has a higher display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Moto Z, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also has 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a really longer battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 92% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.