Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Moto Z's global score of 74.5. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has an older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is a notably newer phone than Moto Z, although it is noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker.
Motorola Moto Z has just a bit better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way more megapixels camera. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a much better battery life than Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Although Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.