Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-09-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.50 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 8.11 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Pastel white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has an overall score of 88.3, which is better than the Moto Z's score of 74.5. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has an older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro construction is notably newer than Moto Z's, but it's thicker and a lot heavier.
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z, because it has more RAM and 4 more CPU cores. The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro counts with a bit better display than Moto Z, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone 7 Pro also has more internal memory capacity. Asus ZenFone 7 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Asus ZenFone 7 Pro also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.