Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z's global score of 74.5. Google Pixel 3 XL is a notably newer device than the Motorola Moto Z, although it is thicker and way heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little sharper display than Moto Z, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a bit larger screen.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher number of cores (and also faster). The Moto Z counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 32% bigger battery capacity. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little bit better camera than Moto Z, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lesser MP back facing camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.