Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 general score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a way newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola Moto Z has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better camera than Moto Z, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G is way more expensive than the Moto Z, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.