Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z's score of 74.5. Even though the Google Pixel 5 is newer than Motorola Moto Z, it is much thicker and just a little bit heavier. Motorola Moto Z counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 5 takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The Moto Z has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 5 has a much better battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 57% greater battery size.
The Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more money than the Moto Z, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.