Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z, with a 77 score against 74.5. Honor 50 Pro's construction is newer than the Motorola Moto Z's, but it's heavier and extremely thicker. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Honor 50 Pro has the older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Honor 50 Pro features a bit better CPU than Moto Z, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. The Moto Z has a bit better screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels number in each inch in the display and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Honor 50 Pro has a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.