Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 534 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than Motorola Moto Z, getting a 92.1 score against 74.5. These phones use Android OS, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the previous 14 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a notably newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z, although it is a lot heavier and noticeably thicker.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a better performing processing unit than Motorola Moto Z, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a way better screen than Moto Z, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1280 x 2800px and a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes a lot better photographs and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a way more mega-pixels camera and a way larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 115 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.