Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 91.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Huawei |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.35 x 5.76 x 0.43 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 10.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate Xs has a score of 91.6, which is a lot better than Moto Z's overall score of 74.5. The Huawei Mate Xs construction is noticeably newer, but notably thicker and incredibly heavier than Moto Z. The Motorola Moto Z has a little more vivid display than Huawei Mate Xs, because although it has a much smaller display and a little lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch of display.
Huawei Mate Xs features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Huawei Mate Xs counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Huawei Mate Xs shoots better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Huawei Mate Xs also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels. The Huawei Mate Xs has a much longer battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 73% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.