Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z, getting a global score of 77 against 74.5. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG G7 Fit has newer 8.1 Oreo version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo, providing the user a couple additional features and performance tweaks. The LG G7 Fit is a much newer phone than Motorola Moto Z, but it's heavier and notably thicker.
LG G7 Fit counts with a sharper display than Moto Z, because it has a slightly higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a little higher display pixels density and a little bit bigger display. The Moto Z and the LG G7 Fit feature similar memory for games and applications, they have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z counts with a bit superior CPU than LG G7 Fit. They have the same RAM amount and 4 cores. The LG G7 Fit has just a little bit longer battery life than Moto Z, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. LG G7 Fit shoots clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.