Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than Moto Z's 74.5 general score. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo, offering some additional features. The LG G7 ThinQ is a newer phone than the Moto Z, although it's somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker.
LG G7 ThinQ features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a quite better pixel count in each inch in the display, a quite bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG G7 ThinQ features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G7 ThinQ also has 32 GB more internal storage.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a larger number of faster cores. The LG G7 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a better resolution back facing camera, a bigger aperture to take better photography in low light environments and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.