Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has an overall score of 82.7, which is better than Moto Z's 74.5 overall score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the LG G8X ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. LG G8X ThinQ's construction is noticeably newer than Moto Z's, although it is incredibly thicker and heavier.
Moto Z counts with a bit better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more processing cores.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG G8X ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z, although it has a lower video definition and a camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
LG G8X ThinQ features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 54 percent larger battery size.
LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.