Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 score. Although LG K92 is newer than Motorola Moto Z, it is much thicker and much heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has an older 10 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG K92 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 2 GB more RAM and more CPU cores (although they are slower). The Motorola Moto Z counts with a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
LG K92 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 96 GB more internal storage capacity. LG K92 shoots way better videos and photos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG K92 also has a lot better resolution camera.
The LG K92 has a very superior battery performance than Moto Z, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
LG K92 costs more than Moto Z, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.