Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is a bit better than Moto Z, with a 78.6 score against 74.5. LG V10 is an older, thicker and incredibly heavier phone than the Moto Z. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V10 has an older 5.1 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The LG V10 features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have an equal 2560 x 1440 resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a quite larger display.
The Moto Z has a little bit better hardware performance than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto Z also has 3 more CPU cores. The LG V10 has more memory for applications and games than Moto Z, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V10 also has more internal storage capacity.
LG V10 takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG V10 also has faster video frame rates and a more mega-pixels camera. The LG V10 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
LG V10 is a bit more expensive than Motorola Moto Z, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.