Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto Z, having a global score of 81.3 against 74.5. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is newer than the Moto Z, it's noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a quite better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a little bit larger screen and a quite higher count of pixels in each inch in the display.
LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal memory capacity. LG V35 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Moto Z, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a back camera with a higher resolution and a larger aperture. LG V35 ThinQ features superior battery life than Moto Z, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.