Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 global score. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is extremely newer than Motorola Moto Z, it's somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z, because although it has a worse video definition and a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ has improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 27% bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.