Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is much better than Moto Z's score of 74.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is way newer than the Moto Z's, although it's notably thicker and heavier.
LG V60 ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Moto Z, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores. Moto Z has a little bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel density.
LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory. LG V60 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a same size aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much better 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ costs more than the Moto Z, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.