Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has an overall score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z's 74.5 score. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's body is notably newer, but noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has older 12 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola Moto Z features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 less CPU cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a lot better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way better video definition and a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.