Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit better than the Moto Z, having an 81.9 score against 74.5. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an older 14 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Motorola Edge 50 Neo is notably newer than the Moto Z, it's extremely thicker and notably heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a little lower display density and a bit lower resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto Z counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less cores (although faster) and 4 GB less RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures greater videos and photos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 66% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.