Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 score. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z, it's noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker.
The Moto Z has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less CPU cores (although they are faster). The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a way lower pixel number per inch in the screen and a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a way larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 73% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.