Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z's score of 74.5. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a extremely newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z, although it is a lot heavier and way thicker.
Motorola Moto Z counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than Moto Z, because although it has a way lower pixel density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rates, a larger camera aperture for better photos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a much better 50 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 73 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.