Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is much better than the Moto Z, with a score of 86.2 against 74.5. The Moto G200 5G construction is much newer, but much thicker and much heavier than Moto Z. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G200 5G has older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z, because it has 4 more cores and 4 GB more RAM. Motorola Moto Z counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount per inch in the display and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution camera.
Moto Z features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G200 5G features a superior battery life than Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.