Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z's general score of 74.5. The Motorola One 5G body is incredibly newer, but way heavier and noticeably thicker than the Motorola Moto Z. Motorola Moto Z features a bit sharper screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Motorola One 5G has a little faster processor than Moto Z, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One 5G also has a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Motorola One 5G features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One 5G counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Motorola One 5G is way more expensive than the Moto Z, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.