Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 74.5. The Motorola One Vision is a way newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z, but it is extremely heavier and a lot thicker. Moto Z features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a just a bit higher pixels density.
The Motorola One Vision features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Vision also has a higher number of cores. Motorola One Vision counts with a greater camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger camera aperture and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola One Vision counts with longer battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.