Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z, getting a score of 80 against 74.5. Motorola One Zoom's construction is way newer, but way heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z. The Motorola One Zoom has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Zoom also has a greater number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto Z features a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola One Zoom features a much better battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 54% more battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, else you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto Z, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.