Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is better than Moto Z's score of 74.5. Motorola razr (2020) is a noticeably newer cellphone than Moto Z, but it is noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more cores. The Moto Z features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) has slightly more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Moto Z, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.