Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 15 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | -- |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 534 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than Moto Z, with a 79.2 score against 74.5. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a notably newer and notably thinner cellphone than Moto Z, but it is also much heavier. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the older 15 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola Moto Z counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a way smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.