Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a global score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z's global score of 74.5. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a way newer device than Moto Z, although it's extremely thicker and extremely heavier. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has 10 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit better processing unit than Moto Z, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z features a bit sharper display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures much clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a way more MP back-facing camera and faster video frame rates.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a very superior battery performance than Moto Z, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto Z, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.