Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is slightly better than the Moto Z, with a 76.4 score against 74.5. Nokia 9 PureView's construction is notably newer than Moto Z's, although it is way heavier and notably thicker. The Nokia 9 PureView features a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z, because it has a little larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Moto Z counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Nokia 9 PureView captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z, although it has a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video quality, they both have the same aperture. Nokia 9 PureView features better battery duration than Moto Z, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Moto Z, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.