Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is slightly better than the Moto Z's 74.5 score. Even though the Nokia XR20 is much newer than Moto Z, it's heavier and noticeably thicker. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Nokia XR20 features a little faster processor than Moto Z, because it has 4 more cores and more RAM. The Motorola Moto Z has a bit sharper display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Nokia XR20 shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Nokia XR20 has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Nokia XR20 features a very superior battery life than Moto Z, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.