Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Ocean |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is much better than Moto Z's score of 74.5. The OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is way newer than Moto Z's, although it's way thicker and noticeably heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3168.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more storage to install applications and games than Moto Z, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a way more megapixels camera and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a very superior battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.