Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has an overall score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z's global score of 74.5. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has the previous 14 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's body is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z's, although it's way heavier and notably thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G and Moto Z both have really similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much worse display density, it also counts with a larger screen. The Moto Z features a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A15 5G features a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A15 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Galaxy A15 5G takes clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same aperture, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A15 5G is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.