Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better than Moto Z, having a 76.2 score against 74.5. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Galaxy A16 5G is a a lot heavier and way thicker phone than the Moto Z. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A16 5G has older 14 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola Moto Z has a much powerful processor than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a display that's very similar to the screen in Moto Z, because although the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much worse pixel amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display.
Moto Z features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a way less MP camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Galaxy A16 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A16 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A16 5G is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.