Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A20s has a score of 77, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z's general score of 74.5. Even though the Galaxy A20s is newer than the Motorola Moto Z, it's noticeably thicker and heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy A20s has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Moto Z features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), they both have the same RAM memory amount. The Moto Z features a much better screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better amount of pixels per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Motorola Moto Z counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same camera aperture and a back facing camera with a 13 MP, the Motorola Moto Z also has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Moto Z has just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 54% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.