Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 is slightly better than the Moto Z, getting a score of 76.1 against 74.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A22 is way newer than the Moto Z, it's notably thicker and much heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 has 12 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 features a bit better processor than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a higher number of cores. Motorola Moto Z counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a way greater pixel count per display inch.
Galaxy A22 features slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto Z captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto Z also counts with a lot better video definition.
Motorola Moto Z counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.