Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is better than Moto Z, having a global score of 84.6 against 74.5. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a way newer phone than the Moto Z, but it is notably thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has an older 11 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Moto Z has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a little bit better performance than Moto Z, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has more cpu cores. The Galaxy A22 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a back camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.