Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has a global score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z's 74.5 global score. The Galaxy A25 5G construction is much newer, but extremely heavier and noticeably thicker than the Moto Z. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has older 14 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Moto Z has a lot better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB less RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a lot lower display pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. The Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.