Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is a bit better than Moto Z's score of 74.5. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the older 11 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a notably newer and noticeably lighter cellphone than Moto Z, although it's also notably thicker.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has 4 more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 92 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.