Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than the Moto Z, with a general score of 79.4 against 74.5. The Galaxy A35 5G is a newer device than Moto Z, but it is extremely thicker and incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy A35 5G has the older 14 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Moto Z has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Motorola Moto Z counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A35 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. The Moto Z has a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.