Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 has a score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than Moto Z's overall score of 74.5. The Samsung Galaxy A41 construction is notably newer, but heavier and much thicker than the Moto Z. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A41 has 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy A41 features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A41 also has a greater number of cores. Motorola Moto Z features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel quantity per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy A41 captures better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Moto Z has a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A41, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A41 counts with greater battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.