Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than Moto Z's score of 74.5. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy A50s's construction is notably newer than Moto Z's, although it's heavier and notably thicker.
The Galaxy A50s has a little faster CPU than Moto Z, because it has more RAM and more cpu cores. The Motorola Moto Z features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels density.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A50s has a very superior battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.