Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Moto Z, getting a 90.8 score against 74.5. Galaxy A51 5G's design is incredibly newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than the Moto Z. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Motorola Moto Z features a little sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of 2.2 gigahertz cores.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a greater camera than Moto Z, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much longer battery performance than Moto Z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G is more expensive than Motorola Moto Z, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.