Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is a lot better than the Moto Z, having a 91.1 score against 74.5. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has older 11 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy A52s construction is newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than Moto Z. Moto Z counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A52s has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A52s features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a lot higher resolution back camera. The Galaxy A52s features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 73% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.