Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z, having a general score of 76.9 against 74.5. Samsung Galaxy A70's construction is way newer, but notably thicker and incredibly heavier than Motorola Moto Z. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A70 has older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Moto Z has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Galaxy A70 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
The Motorola Moto Z takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates. Galaxy A70 features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little more expensive than the Moto Z, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.