Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has a score of 84.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z's overall score of 74.5. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy F23 has the previous 12 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy F23 is a newer and notably lighter phone than the Motorola Moto Z, but it's a lot thicker.
Galaxy F23 counts with just a little better processing power than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy F23 also has a larger number of cores. Moto Z counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy F23, although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP, they both have the same camera aperture. Motorola Moto Z has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy F23 counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.