Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is much better than Moto Z, getting an 85.2 score against 74.5. Samsung Galaxy F41's body is newer than Moto Z's, although it is way heavier and thicker. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Moto Z features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Moto Z has a little bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a bit better processing power than Moto Z, because it has more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy F41 counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 131 percent bigger battery size. The Galaxy F41 takes way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy F41 also has a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.