Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the Motorola Moto Z, having a general score of 88.1 against 74.5. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a notably newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z, but it is extremely heavier and incredibly thicker.
The Galaxy F62 counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Galaxy F62 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display pixels density.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy F62 takes greater photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much higher resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.